|
Feel free to search all your favorite desktop publishing and graphic design topics here ... or anywhere on the web. Simply select the appropriate button below. |
|
Add URL | Altman@Large | ArtLinx | Awards | Backgrounds | BookStore | Bright Ideas Calendar | Clipart & Imaging | Cool Stuff | Design | dtp Links | dtp Services dtp Software | Exit | Fonts | Free Stuff | Graphics Sites | Graphic Utilities | Guestbook Home | Icons | Java | Job Bank | Macintosh | Magazines | Message Boards | News Photoshop | Press Releases | Reviews | Search | Showcase | Sponsorship | Store Templates | Tips | Vendors | Web Designer's Paradise | Windows |
Posted by Lucy Bear on December 31, 1998 at 04:38:21:
In Reply to: Image Composer vs. PhotoDraw 2000 posted by Rob Kaulfuss on November 08, 1998 at 09:46:59:
: How will PhotoDraw 2000 compare or relate to Image Composer as a product. I am new to web grahics and trying to decide which product would be best to learn for someone who is not a professional designer.
A Big warning! If you open a file that was originally created in Image Composer in Photodraw 2000 it will be out of focus!
I bought PhotoDraw and although its easy to use,it was a nightmare opening existing files that I created with MIC. Its also incredibly slow and adding effects to your pictures (and yes my PC was well above the required spec). I highlighted the faults to Microsoft and rather promptly refunded my money. Surfing the net it seems that I am not the only person who has had troublw with PhotoDraw. One said "PhotoDraw = BIG Trouble!