|
Feel free to search all your favorite desktop publishing and graphic design topics here ... or anywhere on the web. Simply select the appropriate button below. |
|
Add URL | Altman@Large | ArtLinx | Awards | Backgrounds | BookStore | Bright Ideas Calendar | Clipart & Imaging | Cool Stuff | Design | dtp Links | dtp Services dtp Software | Exit | Fonts | Free Stuff | Graphics Sites | Graphic Utilities | Guestbook Home | Icons | Java | Job Bank | Macintosh | Magazines | Message Boards | News Photoshop | Press Releases | Reviews | Search | Showcase | Sponsorship | Store Templates | Tips | Vendors | Web Designer's Paradise | Windows |
Posted by Seth Wilson on March 27, 1997 at 17:48:00:
In Reply to: Re: FrameMaker posted by Jan on January 05, 1997 at 03:49:56:
: : : : Does anyone have a feel for Framemaker5.0 and perhaps shed some light as to whether it's worth having in addition to PM6.05. and when would use it in preference to PM6.05 or Quark?
: : : : Thanks in anticipation
: : : Hiya Bill,
: : : I'm not postitive, but it seems to me I've read that people who're doing alot of database publishing prefer Framemaker to just about anything else.
: : : Nancy
: : Hi,
: : FrameMaker 5.0 is ideal for publishing long,
: : complex technical documents such as user manuals.
: : It competes mainly with Ventura and Interleaf.
: : Mike.
: Hi Bill:
: I've used FrameMaker since 1991 and
: I wouldn't use anything else for long technical
: documents, although I use it for everything else
: as well. It has a high learning curve and there
: are some things it can't do compared to Quark,
: but they are few and far between, although with
: a little work you can make it do anything.
: Jan
Seth here, Im evaluating to
see if we should start making our Visuual of
over 65,000 images with frmemaker?
I need help!!!