Feel free to search all your favorite desktop publishing and graphic design topics here ...
or anywhere on the web. Simply select the appropriate button below.

Re: Ventura vs. MS-Word

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Desktop Publishing Talk ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Tom Whitlow on June 11, 1997 at 16:53:40:

In Reply to: Re: Ventura vs. MS-Word posted by Tom Whitlow on June 11, 1997 at 16:45:53:

I also like to start out in Word and finish up in Ventura.

By the way, someone swiped my disk 1 of Ventura for Windows Ver. 4. I really like this version and would like to get a copy of disk 1 from someone. An email with attacments for each of the files on that disk would sure be appreciated.

I tried Corel Ventura 7 and much prefer the old version 4.0 from Xerox.

:
: : : I have been using Ventura since 1988 (V1.1).
: : : Is there any remaining truly valid non-emotional reason to continue to use it instead of changing over to MS Word?
: : : My technical manuals are typically 200 to 400 pages with 40 to 80 page chapters, line drawing, few pictures, black/white laser output.
: : : I would REALLY appreciate some input, as one of my clients is pushing real hard for me to convert to Word (which I already use as a word processor).
: : : Thanks!
: : :
: : : Bruce Koehler

: : If your client wants you to switch, that may be reason enough. I've used Ventura about as long as you have, and I've used Word for a few years, too. You can accomplish quite a bit in Word the same as Ventura, but you sometimes take quite a loss in ease of control.

: : For example, if you use Ventura's table of contents or indexing features, you'll find it difficult to make that work as well in Word when you're dealing with multiple "chapters" (master documents of that size can become unweildy). Keeping your graphics to stay where you put them, or stay with the text they're supposed to be with, can also be frustrating in Word.

: : On the other hand, Ventura is no match for Word in text editing capabilities. Word styles have the added advantage of being based on the style it was built from, so if you do it right it's a piece of cake to quickly change the whole look of your document with a few easy steps. You can also write macros in Word to handle repetitive tasks.

: : If my client wants a document in Word, or whatever application, that's how I'll produce it. If they don't care, I try to pick the tools that work best for the task. I often play with a design in Word because it's so easy to change attributes for just one paragraph, but then I'll do the production in Ventura because the control is better over the span of a large project. So I use both, trying to maximize the strengths of each.

Follow Ups:

Re: Ventura vs. MS-Word LLoyd 16:23:02 12/06/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: I also like to start out in Word and finish up in Ventura. : By the way, someone swiped my disk 1 of Ventura for Windows Ver. 4. I really like this version and would like to get a copy of disk 1 from someone. An email with attacments for each of the files on that disk would sure be appreciated. : I tried Corel Ventura 7 and much prefer the old version 4.0 from Xerox. : : : : : : I have been using Ventura since 1988 (V1.1). : : : : Is there any remaining truly valid non-emotional reason to continue to use it instead of changing over to MS Word? : : : : My technical manuals are typically 200 to 400 pages with 40 to 80 page chapters, line drawing, few pictures, black/white laser output. : : : : I would REALLY appreciate some input, as one of my clients is pushing real hard for me to convert to Word (which I already use as a word processor). : : : : Thanks! : : : : : : : : Bruce Koehler : : : If your client wants you to switch, that may be reason enough. I've used Ventura about as long as you have, and I've used Word for a few years, too. You can accomplish quite a bit in Word the same as Ventura, but you sometimes take quite a loss in ease of control. : : : For example, if you use Ventura's table of contents or indexing features, you'll find it difficult to make that work as well in Word when you're dealing with multiple "chapters" (master documents of that size can become unweildy). Keeping your graphics to stay where you put them, or stay with the text they're supposed to be with, can also be frustrating in Word. : : : On the other hand, Ventura is no match for Word in text editing capabilities. Word styles have the added advantage of being based on the style it was built from, so if you do it right it's a piece of cake to quickly change the whole look of your document with a few easy steps. You can also write macros in Word to handle repetitive tasks. : : : If my client wants a document in Word, or whatever application, that's how I'll produce it. If they don't care, I try to pick the tools that work best for the task. I often play with a design in Word because it's so easy to change attributes for just one paragraph, but then I'll do the production in Ventura because the control is better over the span of a large project. So I use both, trying to maximize the strengths of each.

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Desktop Publishing Talk ]

Feel free to search the entire desktopPublishing.com site ...
or anywhere on the web. Select the appropriate button below.