|
Feel free to search all your favorite desktop publishing and graphic design topics here ... or anywhere on the web. Simply select the appropriate button below. |
|
Add URL | Altman@Large | ArtLinx | Awards | Backgrounds | BookStore | Bright Ideas Calendar | Clipart & Imaging | Cool Stuff | Design | dtp Links | dtp Services dtp Software | Exit | Fonts | Free Stuff | Graphics Sites | Graphic Utilities | Guestbook Home | Icons | Java | Job Bank | Macintosh | Magazines | Message Boards | News Photoshop | Press Releases | Reviews | Search | Showcase | Sponsorship | Store Templates | Tips | Vendors | Web Designer's Paradise | Windows |
Posted by Andreas Bohlin on October 18, 1998 at 08:49:54:
In Reply to: Re: ColorSync/ monitor - printed images matching - is it worth it ? posted by Mark Sivell Smith ie(Color One) on January 13, 1998 at 00:17:09:
First (as you probably know): color is more simple
then people seem to think these days.
I think the problem started when CMYK was to be displayed
on a RGB monitor.
Make it simple, just like in a conventionell
drum-scanner; use the software binuscan ColorPro.
Supports any CCD. Produce a RGB image (lets call it a
"slide") on your screen (with or without the help
of binuscan) and the you separate (CMYK) in binuscan
and you'll get the same quality as from you drum.
binuscan produces a separation that is, in any case,
"full range" and then the paper sets the "gammut-
limitation". Even colorprinter-profiles can be done
in binuscan. binuscan has ICC-support; it leavs the
ICC-tags untouched.
binuscan also gives you a higher productivity.
Good luck.